The specific roles of media in these studies are varied and as such they merit efforts to clarify and elucidate.Īn appropriate image of the person for geographers is an entity with fluctuating boundaries that reach through space and time in constantly changing patterns. Interest in media is tangential to the main orientation of many studies, but it lies behind a wide range of concerns such as “identity formation,” “narrative,” “scale,” “discourses,” “publics,” and “networks.” The sub-disciplines most engaged in studies of media are urban, economic, political and social geography, as well as studies of gender, mobilities, embodiment, and nonrepresentational theory. In Britain, despite the absence of an RGS-IBG study group dedicated to the topic, a phenomenal amount of interest has been directed towards new media and communication topics in the past five years. Since that time, an online “journal of media geography,” Aether, has published several issues and a specialty group dedicated to “Communication Geography” has emerged in the Association of American Geographers paralleling some of the interests of the older “Geography of the Global Information Society” commission in the International Geographical Union. This interest in mediated communication was not the case in the late 1990s, when Ken Hillis wrote about the “invisibility of communications in geography” (1998). Most references are oblique, as when an article is an attempt to destabilize environmental views promoted by “the media,” but some are direct, as in studies of particular uses of certain media. Scarcely an issue of any leading geography journal published in the past year can be found that does not contain at least one article referring to communications or media.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |